Sunday, March 3, 2019

Is Patriarchy the Main Cause of Gender Inequality?

This view is held by Radical libbers, they suppose that patriarchy is inn is the reason that wo manpower argon oppress and exploited by men, and rednesss for example hold the view that the capitalist formation is the reason for the grammatical sexual urge disparity. Feminists debate that women argon unequal to men, and as a result indian lodge benefits men whilst exploiting men. Feminist investigate the exercises that this inequation has on womens power, status, roles and life chances.They believe that sex inequality is socially constructed an example is gender roles these ar taught to children at very young ages and march on these gender inequalities to become part of societys norms. The divers(prenominal) flake of womens rightists believe different reasons for gender inequality, there are liberal, radical red ink and postmodern feminists, radical are arguably the most extreme and disputed feminist group. Radical feminist believe patriarchy has been socialised into society making it current, this results in the unequal gender inequality for women.People in society are taught male patriarchy with education, male dominance is implement and a masculine view of the world is presented to children, this is shown through with(predicate) the gendered subjects and the teacher interposition of male and female students. They argue that male dominance has become accepted in society so much so that this leads to violence towards women being accepted in the home and on the streets. Radical feminists believe that men exploit and oppress women. They believe that the family plays a significant role in aiding this conquest, as women can be exploited by their male partners through abuse and the additional turn they do.However, Marxist criticise radicals for generalising womens experiences, womens experiences vary greatly depending on their class, ethnicity and household type. If a women was from a midst class background she is more standardisedly to suffer in the family, as its accepted that only the man works, bringing greater equality than if they both worked. Radical feminist are critics by liberals for failing to bonk any change to gender becoming more equal, for example cable car insurance since 2012 is now the resembling amount for both men and women, Radicals are often critiqued for having an outdated look on gender inequality.Marxist feminists fundamentally believe unlike Radicals that womens oppression is strongly linked to the capitalist system. They believe that women are exploited mainly at home and in the workforce, in the home they reproduce the next generation of workers whilst ensuring the stability of the current generation. This is illustrated through Ansleys study, which concluded that women are disadvantaged as they absorb the frustration and ira from husbands who are in turn exploited at work. The Patriarchy political orientation present in society enables women to accept the inequality thats presen t.Marxist hump that there has been a shift in the male aspect of home(prenominal) and child care, however its women who still pitch to do the majority and are therefore the most disadvantaged. Women are more disadvantaged than men as they form the reserve labour legions this means they work at cheaper rates and can be hired and fired much more freely than men, this also leads to women being more likely to partake in part time and shorter hour jobs, this encourages the dependency that women obligate upon men.However the reserve the States of labour fails to acknowledge the gendered nature of jobs, it doesnt explain why women are the reserve army. Radical feminist argue that Marxist feminists pay withal little attention to patriarchy, the main cause of womens oppression alternatively focus greatly on the capitalist system which could be seen as completely irrelevant ion terms of womens inequality. Black feminists highlight that they give the sack ethnic minority groups, and l ike Radicals categorise womens experiences into a greenness group.Postmodern feminists hold the view that there are a wide throw away of masculinities and felinities to pick and distinguish from in todays society, therefore allowing women to choose the lifestyle they lead, this suggest that women dont suffer they only chose to be unequal if they desire. This also suggests that patriarchal views arent necessarily held anymore, and if they are they have subsequently less impact as people can have more choice in society. They also believe that womens oppression cant be summed up into one common ground, all(prenominal) circumstance is greatly different.And they acknowledge that there are fundamental differences among women which will inevitably affect the choices they contact. They believe that other forms of feminism are outdated and in some cases have a negatively charged effect as they are making women unhappy with their lifestyles, kind of of correcting the problems present in society they feel that feminists particularly Radicals just highlight the problems. They hold the same opinions as hakim in regards to feminism having a negative alternatively than positive effect on women.Hakim however believes that feminism has created myths about womens life, and argues like Postmodern feminism that feminism its having a negative effect on women, she believes that patriarchy isnt the reason for gender inequality and in material fact gender inequality is less prominent than feminist make it out to be. Hakim accuses feminist of inventing their own myths about womens work attitudes and behaviour. She found there were five main myths about feminism. Some examples are women employment has been rising, and childcare is the main barrier preventing women competing fully with men, these myths clearly run afoul feminist views.She also found that men and women do have different work orientation, and that it shouldnt necessarily be seen as a negative thing, they just happen to be different. She also believed another myth was that the gender turn everywhere was different, she believes that men and women get paid the same regardless of sex, Marxist would strongly disagree as the women are only the reserve army of labour so therefore dont earn as much as the breadwinning males. Half of two thirds of women hold traditional gender views, suggesting that overall womens attitudes to work are weaker than mens.However Ginn argues Hakims claims are oversimplified, and there are considerable gaps between groups. Womens attitudes fluctuate and change over time and so the divisions cant be fixed. Ginn also argues that Hakim also has no convincing explanation, she has just stated the problems not why they occur. Other reasons for womens attitudes could be shaped by the wider social mise en scene this could be influenced by the patriarchal system. Hakim suggests that womens attitudes are ever-changing but much slower than feminists think. Delamount also found weakness in Hakims argument, as she based her evidence on only one life-sized scale survey.This presents numerous flaws as it wasnt over a vast period time span and the methods themselves could be incorrect, so the findings were very supposed(prenominal) to represent the population as a whole. In conclusion, radical feminist believe patriarchy is the main reason for gender inequality. Marxist feminist however see the capitalist system as the reason for gender inequality. Hakim strongly disagrees that patriarchy is the reason for gender inequality and instead argues that childcare prevents women competing with men, particularly in the workplace.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.